This integration test fails intermittently because we cache the initial
total value to be able to compare it to the new total value at the end
of the test to check that it's different before doing the assertions.
However, this doesn't work as expected because the second `clearInput`
call triggers an intermediate total value calculation because it clicks
on another input field and that triggers a sandbox event.
This results in the `waitForFunction` calls always resolving immediately
and since we don't use other means of waiting until the calculation is
done (using e.g. `waitForSandboxTrip`) we basically rely on the time
between the final click and the assertions to be enough for the sandbox
to do its work. If it's is not done in that time, we do the assertions
with older values and that makes the test fail.
This commit fixes the issue by simply waiting for the total value to be
what we expect it to be. This requires less code, is more consistent
with the other integration tests and removes the possibility of doing
assertions against older values.
The function evaluateOnNewDocument in Puppeteer allow us to execute some js before the pdf.js one
is loaded.
It allows us to stub some setters before there are used and then set some event handlers very soon.
It looks like this has accidentally been copy/pasted from the
`Textfields and focus` block, which is the only one in which a test
actually uses it. We can therefore safely remove it from all other
blocks where no test uses it.
Code inspection uncovered that quite a few integration tests don't wait
for scripting to be ready before proceeding, which is a source of
intermittent failures, especially on slower machines where e.g. creating
the sandbox takes longer.
This commit fixes the issues by introducing a `waitForScripting` helper
function and calling it consistently in all scripting integration tests.
This integration test fails intermittently because we're not (correctly)
awaiting the character limit increase sandbox action.
For the first increase an attempt was made to handle this, but it doesn't
work correctly because the text in the field is `abcdefghijklmnopq` and
it's not be truncated until the sandbox action is completed, so because
we didn't await that we would could pass the `value !== "abcdefgh"` check
because `abcdefghijklmnopq !== abcdefgh` is true. For the second increase
we didn't have a check in place.
This commit fixes the issues by using the `waitForSandboxTrip` and
`waitForSelector` helper functions to make sure that we can only proceed
if the sandbox action is completed and the DOM element is updated.
This commit replaces most `waitForTimeout` occurrences with calls to
`waitForFunction` or `waitForSandboxTrip`. Note that the occurrences in
the "must check that focus/blur callbacks aren't called" test remain
until we find a good way to ensure that nothing happened after the tab
switches (because currently we can't be sure that nothing happens since
there is nothing to await).
We should not wait for an arbitrary amount of time, which can easily
cause intermittent failures, but wait for a value change instead. Note
that this patch mirrors the approach we already use in other scripting
integration tests that also check for a value change; see e.g. the
"must check that a field has the correct formatted value" test.
We should not wait for an arbitrary amount of time, which can easily
cause intermittent failures, but wait for a property value change
instead. Note that this patch mirrors the approach we already use in
other scripting integration tests that also check for a visibility
change; see e.g. the "must show a text field and then make in invisible
when content is removed" test.
The `waitForTimeout` function should not be used anymore and only exists
for old usages that have to be rewritten, but there was nothing in place
to signal this. This commit therefore implements a linting rule, specific
to the integration tests, to make it clear that this function should no
longer be used. We exclude the old usages from it because we are already
tracking those in #17656 (so this patch is mostly to not make the scope
of that issue bigger).
This test intermittently fails, likely because the auto-print is triggered fast enough
that we don't manage to get it.
So this patch aims to try to set a listener very early in order to be sure that
we'll be aware that a print has been triggered.
Some fields, somewhere under the Fields entry in Acroform, could have no name (in T)
but with a parent which has a name but which isn't somewhere under Fields.
As a side-effect, this patch prevents infinite loops because of potential cycles
under Fields.
It's not necessary because we have configured silent printing for
Firefox and Chrome in the browser arguments we pass in `test.mjs`. This
means that the print dialog is not even shown at all or disappears
automatically once printing is done, so the Escape key press serves no
purpose. Since it has been shown to time out, likely because the page
loses focus during printing, and because the page itself doesn't know
when the printing dialog is shown and we therefore can't possibly do the
key press at the right time anyway, this commit gets rid of it to
stabilize the test.
